posted Oct 24, 2011 7:24 PM by Alison von Schlieder
|
The 2011 Net Impact Bay Area Mixer at the Press Club was a success! With over 85 attendees from SF Professional, SF State, USF, Stanford, Haas, Dominican and Presido chapters, Net Impact members mixed and mingled over wine and beer in the atmospheric lounge of the Press Club. |
posted Oct 20, 2011 8:54 PM by Helena Meryman
[
updated Oct 25, 2011 6:12 PM
]
It was a house packed with women (and a few men) for a
Renewable Energy Career Panel at the Hub. This event was organized in partnership with SF Women’s
Environmental Network (WEN), Bay Area Women of Wind Energy (WoWE -- pronounced wow-ee!). Our partners did a
great job putting together a panel of women working in the field in a variety
of capacities.
Each panelist presented briefly on their work history, and the events and
decisions that shaped the course of their careers. They used their personal stories,
relating to the audience through lessons learned. A handful of themes emerged, leading to the big
take a-ways from the evening:
- Dare to Transition
- Be Flexible
- Aim High
- Be the Best
- Have a Guiding Principle
- Is Work and Life in Balance? This is not always
the right question.
Stephanie Wang (we’ll call Stephanie an All-Star because this
was her second dynamic performance on an NISFP panel) spoke with great enthusiasm
about her current work and the mission of the Clean Coalition. Stephanie works on
policies and programs that accelerate the adoption of cost-effective clean
local energy across the United States; this represents a significant career transition
for Stephanie from a more conventional law practice. Stephanie’s story and her
considerable reflection brought out some of the evenings most salient points. The reward for daring to transition into the
renewable energy field will be directly proportional to the meaning you derive
from the work, the passion you bring to it and your commitment to working hard and
continued learning. Stephanie pointed out “you aren’t helping the Movement by getting a sustainability job if there was someone
that could do the job better, so you must commit to working really hard”.
Sonita Lontoh helped frame the discussion by sharing how
she developed her career upon guiding principles. Sonita knew that she had to apply
her business and engineering skills to something that would create more good in
the world. When the opportunity arose to work on carbon and renewable programs
and smart grid technology it was simple – it met her criteria.
Having a sound, yet broad guiding principle can be very useful,
it allows for adaptation and flexibility, which every panelist agreed is
important. Seizing the opportunities that arise and making the most of them is a
key to advancing your career. For Pamela Lippe, flexibility is the willingness
to adapt your skill sets; this allowed her to survive and thrive through the
early tumults of the green movement and today’s economy. Daphne Li cautioned
all to “aim higher”. Women tend to undersell themselves, while most men are
conditioned to do the opposite. This puts the female job searcher at a real
disadvantage. Sonita added that many aspects of the renewable economy are so
new it doesn’t take long to be considered an expert. She gave the example that if
you’ve been working in smart grid for 2 or 3 years you are an expert!
There was a subtle undertow of Work/Life balance questions.
Or should I say rip tide? There was a diversity of experience and attitudes,
and yet total agreement that it remains an issue society at large is still not
adequately addressing. Sonita’s view posed the question nicely; she advised “of
course it is easier without children, but don’t think of it as work/life
balance; think of it as work/life choice, as an integration”. Stephanie’s approach? She declared with a huge
enthused smile “Work is my life!” The
only panelist with young children Daphne Li, described how her company accommodated
her during a difficult pregnancy, which prompted all to agree that the
enlightenment quotient of one’s employer was the most important factor in determining
experience, especially for those with dependents.
Here are some career advice highlights from the Q&A
session:
- Energy work is at the intersection of
engineering, finance and business development; think about where you fit in.
- If you are still in school take classes that
will give you expertise (related to above).
- Publish something; you’ll be considered an
expert!
- Use the clean tech and women’s networks. They
are strong, active and supportive.
- Keep track of your colleagues and contacts if
you change companies, you’ll need them.
- Negotiate a “Board Observer Status” as a way to
gain a foothold up the ladder.
- Look for mentors, gender is not important, dedication
is.
Much thanks to…. panelists:
Pamela Lippe, Sonita Lontoh, Stephanie Wang, Daphne Li and Liz Oh (moderator);
media sponsors: the Solar Marketing Group, Women in Cleantech and
Sustainability/Technica Communications and AWWEE (Association of Women in
Water, Energy, and the Environment); Rico’s Catering; Frey Winery; The Hub SF;
and Andrea Taber (lead organizer). Photos courtesy of Anne-Franziska Sinner |
posted Oct 10, 2011 7:05 PM by Net Impact San Francisco
[
updated Oct 10, 2011 8:27 PM by Adam Menter
]
Good people, a beautiful day, and delicious pancakes. What more could you ask for on a Sunday morning? |
posted Oct 10, 2011 7:04 PM by Net Impact San Francisco
Organized by Avary Kent. Facilitation by Jim Turner, Maura Dilley, and Avary Kent.
On Wednesday August 24th Net Impact convened 52 people for The Future of Impact Investing, a three-hour workshop for the Impact Investing community. The initial frame for the conversation was appreciative inquiry, where the group was able to share what they believe is working well, what has momentum, and how to overcome the barriers facing this sector. Net Impact was highlighted as one of the early groups that brought people together in this space. Sara Olsen of SVT Group recounted stories of partnering with Net Impact to start the Global Social Venture Competition in 1999.
The emergent theme for the evening was the power of effective communication. We discussed specific information that everyone in the community should know, for example the 179 deduction (www.section179.org). We also discussed vehicles for engaging a broader audience – investment advisors, wealth managers, retail investors. Of specific interest: where are we going, and how do we get there?
As a collective community, Impact Investors know about many of the exciting new initiatives to reshape our economic models, worldwide. Companies like Infosys and Tata in India have been putting people on the asset side of the balance sheet as their “Human Capital Valuation”. Corporations around the world are putting more resources and effort into their CSR initiatives and developing products and services to align them with the new “sharing economy,” and new media resources are enabling more people to be engaged than ever before.
These ideas were explored, and the energy generated in the room around our collective wisdom and knowledge was an excellent introduction to the small group sessions that branched off for the rest of the evening. One group explored the question, “How do we move the conversation so that ‘Impact Investing’ is just ‘Investing’?” Momentum emerged on several specific projects:
- A sustainable agriculture white paper
- A working group to enhance wikipedia topics where social enterprise and impact investment are relevant
- Information sessions on incorporation models and funding strategies for social entrepreneurs and impact investors
- There was enthusiasm about continuing these conversations at future events. For those who were unable to join us on the 24th we will have a storytelling session to build stronger connections within our community at SOCAP ’11 on September 8th at 3:25PM. We will also have our virtual event hosted by Discovery Cast on October 4 – 7th open to all Net Impact Members.
|
posted Oct 10, 2011 6:58 PM by Net Impact San Francisco
[
updated Oct 10, 2011 7:00 PM
]
The discussion at last Wednesday’s “Careers to Callings” event was fantastic. Thanks to everyone who made it out – and a special thanks to Ibanga Umanah for conceiving and catalyzing the event, Julie Menter for facilitating, Rayna Wiles for visually recording, and all of our special guests (Phillipe Goldin, Colleen Murray, Kate Mulder, and Brian Sullivan).
Some quick takeaways of the event are below (thanks to Emily Sadigh for helping with these notes!)
Personal Actions to Improve Work:
- Being happy at work often simply involves really knowing yourself. Taking the time to be mindful of your emotions and meditate can help with this - as can really understanding your particular strengths. Remember, what comes easily to you might be a valuable strength.
- Simply clarifying and stating your values can reduce stress-causing cortisol levels.
- Being really up front about who you are with co-workers is important - bring more dimensions of yourself to it. Don’t be a different person at work than you are outside of work.
- Journal, keep track of your successes and failures
- Take advantage of review processes, take people out to lunch, ask your boss what his/her long-term goals are
- Realize that what you’re doing at work – even if you don’t love it – may prove invaluable to you later on in life (and towards ends you care more about). Think about your experience path and the skills you are building.
- Each day, think about who you’re serving? When you feel like what you’re doing is helping others (even if only one person) – it can bring you out of the daily grind and give you a greater sense of meaning.
Model Company Programs (good examples for your workplace)
- The companies that have the most engaged employees are those that have a strong culture and can really clearly tell you what they are and what they are not (i.e. Patagonia).
- Google’s G2G program (googlers teaching googlers, everything from biking to statistics) (http://knol.google.com/k/steph-fastre/teach-and-you-shall-learn/1fc9wqbhtn4k0/2#)
- Google’s meditation rooms (knowing yourself builds self-confidence) and places for play and interaction (ball pen, cafeteria)
- Title 9's worst mistake contest (risk-taking indicates autonomy/ownership)
- Sabre’s Walk in Your Shoes Program
- Sabre’s “Hack Day” (open time to invent something new and improved)
- St. Jude Medical bringing in a patient helped by the company's product or emailing when a heart valve is made for a baby
- Talent show or group volunteer program to unearth skills and create other forms of interaction
- St Jude Medical’s performance reviews requiring employees to write down long-term goals that ensure annual conversations about employee’s long-term jobs and their current job relates
Other takeaways:
- As companies (and individuals) grow – there is an “ossification” process that makes them move slower.
- People are much more likely to stay in a situation where they feel unfulfilled than shift to something that is uncomfortable.
- Alignment of personal, societal, and business goals is a powerful combination.
Further resources and reading:
- Drive by Daniel Pink (three elements of true motivation—autonomy, mastery, and purpose). Also see TED Talk: http://www.ted.com/talks/dan_pink_on_motivation.html
- Fred Factor by Mark Sanborn (the example of Fred the Postman)
- Firms of Endearment (about how values-based firms outperform) http://www.firmsofendearment.com/index.html
- Habits of the Heart (job, career, calling) (preview available on google books)
- Gallup’s “best friend at work” dimension: http://gmj.gallup.com/content/511/item-10-best-friend-work.aspx
- Wired to Care by Dev Patnaik (of Jump Associates)
- Mindfulness clock
|
posted Oct 10, 2011 6:50 PM by Adam Menter
[
updated Oct 20, 2011 9:54 PM by Helena Meryman
]
We had a full house at Hub SOMA for our star-studded panel on the current state of climate policy. For those of you who missed it, here are some highlights...
Policy needs to improve to make tangible progress...
- To stabilize the climate, we need to reach 80% below 1990 GHG emissions by 2050. Even opponents to climate legislation agree with this.
- In the absense of binding international agreement with teeth, current solution is to "pledge and review" - where each nation makes voluntary pledges (based on what they can get past parliament, congress, etc). These are not based on ecological limits.
- Putting a price on carbon is a market-based response to a market failure (we're paying the cost collectively as a society). The problem is that we can't agree on how to price it - so tangible action is being stalled. If we just started with a price of $10/ton, we'd at least move forward.
- The future of renewables is local. Sound policy and incentives is key to decentralizing power production. Feed-in-Tarriffs (FIT) are much more effective than current net-metering schemes. Generatenow.org has more information and resources.
But you can make money in CleanTech, especially where market conditions are right...
- Clean technology continues to evolve. The U.S. will buy this techology from whoever makes it. Companies based in countries that have set the right market conditions will be the leaders. The U.S.'s fundamental underlying policy on the Climate is the same as it was in 2007 - which is not enough to stimulate demand for CleanTech.
- However the recovery act provides incentives and funding for clean tech ventures. Many of these dollars haven't "hit the street" yet. Energy.gov/recovery is full of business opportunities. Also, the Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Export Initiative (export.gov/reee) offers resources to promote trade for U.S. based firms.
And educating/advocating at a local level is extremely important...
- One of the most important things that businesses can do is to educate their employees and their customers on the climate. The underlying knowledge base in the U.S. is slim and more understanding is necessary for widespread public conviction.
- Democracy takes time - but to make things happen, start getting involved locally. 99% of life is just showing-up. Show up at local government meetings/hearings and write "letters to the editor" (they will listen!).
- Peter Brown from the SFMTA made the point that planners and public officials usually meet staunch opposition from the business community when they try to change "business as usual" (i.e. congestion pricing). More businesses need to come out in favor of change - and the Net Impact community is perfect to help. Specifically, letter writing and attending public hearings in support of bold, sustainable, business enhancing practices will be critical to moving our electeds in the right direction. He's working on an updated Climate Action Plan and will need our help!
A big thanks to Helena Meryman from the Net Impact SF leadership team for making it happen. And another thank-you to our panelists: Holmes Hummel,Victor Menotti, Stacy Jackson, Stephanie Wang, and Martin Wagner.
|
posted Oct 10, 2011 6:42 PM by Adam Menter
[
updated Oct 10, 2011 6:48 PM
]
This is a summary of our panel discussion on April 27, 2011 on the future of corporate sustainability. Visual recordings of the panel by Rayna Wiles (designer, frog design).
We organized a panel on the future of corporate sustainability with a great group of panelists with Joel Makower from Greenbiz, Jamais Cascio, research fellow at the Institute for the Future, Michael Kobori, Vice-President, Social and Environmental Sustainability, Levi Strauss & Co and Glen Low, Principal at Blu Skye Sustainability Consulting. Here were the highlights of the discussion.
The tone of the conversation was set immediately when the group agreed that business needs to be regenerative rather than simply focus on reducing its impact. We need a revolution, not just an evolution: business should aim to create more clean water, more clean air, less poverty and less hunger. As Glen outlined in his introduction, companies should redefine themselves to drive long-term benefit to shareholders and stakeholders; products with the best environmental and social footprint should also the least expensive. Once the group had agreed on this North Star, the discussion shifted to what business can DO to reach that goal.
First of all, Joel noted that business is doing a lot already (“today, businesses are walking more than they are talking”). As consumers, we might not be aware of this because many of the companies taking action are in the B2B space and because others are cautious of being accused of greenwashing. Nonetheless, while the incremental steps that many are taking are making a difference, it was clear to the panelists that those will be insufficient given the scale of the challenges we are faced with.
Luckily, the panelists had plenty of recommendations on ways to make business more regenerative:
- Build momentum in your organization by aligning sustainability with your company culture and business model. For example, Levi’s focuses its efforts on product designers. Once designers got excited about sustainability, the company was able to create the “waterless jeans”. If you’re talking to Walmart, you need to emphasize cost savings in the supply chain.
- Be courageous and set an example for others to follow. For example, Levi’s set stringent labor standards for its factory 20 years ago. Back then, everyone thought it would raise the company’s costs too much but today, it’s become an expectation for every company to have at least minimum labor standards.
- Work to get the entire system to change. Many problems cannot be solved by just one company – the entire system needs to be engaged for change to happen. This is what leading apparel companies are doing with the Sustainable Apparel Coalition.
- Increase transparency by sharing information about the impact of your products (e.g. LCA for Levi’s 501)
- Value nature so that companies who are doing the right thing get rewarded, those doing the wrong thing see their costs increase (“align the company P&L with the laws of nature” as Glen said)
- “Think long, fail fast” (in Jamais’ words): understand what needs to be different 30 years down the road, experiment constantly along the way to find the models that work
- Envision what happens when we get it right: paint a positive picture of the future. In Jamais’ words: “resist the desire to be an apocaphyle (apocalypse lover)”
The panel then discussed the role of NGOs. Panelists appreciated their role as a “social conscience” to prod companies to do the right thing. For example, Greenpeace’s viral video about Kit Kat showing the company’s linkage to deforestation in Indonesia (graphically replacing the iconic chocolate bars with orangutan fingers) was successful in getting Nestle, the parent company, to start using sustainable palm oil. On the other hand, these campaigns are often only aimed at the brand leaders – in spite of the positive actions they are taking. As Joel said, “no one beats up Burger King”, McDonalds is the only company that ever seems to be targeted in the fast-food industry. In addition to playing the role of social conscience, NGOs can also help companies by providing expertise. A great example of that is the collaboration between Dow Chemicals and The Nature Conservancy to quantify the value provided by nature (a.k.a. the ecosystem services) at three of the company’s manufacturing plants.
What is the role of consumers in all of this? Overall, the panel agreed that consumers are not willing to sacrifice any product attributes (price, quality,…) to go green regardless of what they may be saying in surveys. Sustainable product attributes are at best a tie-breaker between products with the same price, quality and functionality. In other words, consumers want “change without changing” as Joel said.
The panels also hinted at the limits of the paradigm in which we are currently operating. Today, there are no scalable business models that are truly regenerative. Even though ideas like biomimicry and cradle to cradle have inspired many, those ideas have failed to be widely adopted so far. Emerging business models like those based on collaborative consumption ( car sharing for example) are a great step in the right direction but have not proven scalable. In the end, Jamais suggested that it’s our growth based paradigm that needs to be re-thought. By focusing on resilience, building our ability to withstand shocks that none of us can predict, we might find a better path to true sustainability.
In spite of these challenges, it was reassuring to hear that all of the panelist were optimistic about the future. Provided we are able to tackle our “natural debt” (in Glen’s words), there is reason to hope. Jamais summed it up best when he concluded “I’m pessimistic in the short term, but the ability of the human species to learn and change, sometimes drastically, makes me optimistic in the long term”. |
|